Supreme Court Climate Liability Arguments
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Monday in Boulder County's climate lawsuit against Suncor and ExxonMobil.
DIFFERENT FOCUS
Coverage broadly emphasized Corporate Accountability for Climate Harm; Coverage broadly emphasized Federal Authority vs. Climate Lawfare.
LEFT FOCUS
- ▸Most of the eight justices appeared more skeptical of the fossil fuel companies than of Boulder. — New Republic
- ▸Boulder alleges Suncor and ExxonMobil knowingly deceived the public about climate harms for decades. — New Republic
- ▸The case has repercussions beyond climate, affecting how broadly local governments can hold corporations accountable. — NPR Politics
- ▸Boulder, like many Western communities, faces heightened drought and wildfire risk it attributes to fossil fuel production. — New Republic
- ▸The justices are being asked to weigh whether the Clean Air Act preempts state-court climate suits. — NBC News
RIGHT FOCUS
- ▸The Daily Signal described the litigation as 'climate lawfare' that could open the floodgates to 90,000 municipal suits. — Daily Signal
- ▸The Trump Department of Justice participated in oral arguments alongside lawyers for Suncor and ExxonMobil. — Washington Free Beacon
- ▸Coverage emphasized that the lawsuits are brought by Democrat-run cities, counties, and states. — Washington Free Beacon
- ▸A ruling for Boulder could force oil companies to pay billions covering floods, droughts, and heat waves. — Washington Free Beacon
- ▸The outcome is expected to either broadly allow or shut down similar climate suits nationwide. — Washington Examiner